The biggest academic ceremony of the year, SU's investment in the government's strategic research areas, and a deep dive into the Bergius Botanic Garden. Plus, the vice-chancellor on e-infrastructure and exam fraud.
To be included as an author of an academic publication implies responsibility for the work that is reported. Responsibility in the sense that one deserves the merit to have the publication in one’s CV, but also in the sense that one is to be held accountable in case the publication is found faulty. This means that authorship is both valuable, important and to be taken seriously. There are suggested criteria for when someone is to be listed as an author, but what more specifically does it take to fulfill these criteria? What differences in authorship norms exist between disciplines? How can authorship conflicts best be prevented and handled? Are all authors of a paper to be held accountable, and risk sanctions, if problems are discovered?
%20Acc-entre_w1200.jpg)
